Week11-Critical Reflection-Conflict

GROUP:DCLD
GRADE:C-

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION _ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position? 

For me this group didn't connect with the audience well. The presentation seemed with no clear and focused understanding on the topic at hand.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?


Writing was general and not very clear.

DISTINCTIVEBNESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific? 


Provided good examples, most of it based on their project and relevant. Information provided seemed reliable but something that anybody could look up on the Internet.

REFERENCING _ Are all sources of content properly referenced? 


Referencing of facts, elements and images are evident in the presentation.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?


The video is good to allow audience to gain a further understanding.

THE STILL IMAGES_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

Yes; Images were aboundant and some were from the project itself which was effective to show the group progress. However some pictures are too small.








GROUP:KINECTING THE BOXES
GRADE:D

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION _ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position? 

The presentation started out quite well and the introduction was quite attractive and effectively intrigued me as part of the audience. However, the presentation ended up dragging out for quite a substantial period.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?


Writing was concise and clear. 

DISTINCTIVEBNESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific? 


Provided good examples, the information was relevant to the topic and in-depth. A bit of lack of summarising of the information wich lead to some repetition.

REFERENCING _ Are all sources of content properly referenced? 


Referencing of facts, elements and images are evident in the presentation.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?


Yes; They connect the issues to their own project, this creates a strong sense of understanding of conflict.

THE STILL IMAGES_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

Images used to define the topic of conflict was effective and many of the images stood out on slides which was fantastic.