Week6-Critical Reflection-Planning

GROUP: 3RD CONSTRUCT
GRADE: CR

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION _ 

Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position? 

They separated the content as content and content communication. Every team members talked and very clear, concise and appropriately information given.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ 
Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

They provided excellent context in both quality and quantity. Font and format of the texts presented very appropriately. However, the context need to be more concise and clear. Sometimes, watching too much text  as long as listening to the speaker was getting confused. 

DISTINCTIVEBNESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ 
Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific? 

I think there could be more example about planning would be better to communicate with audience. 

REFERENCING _ 
Are all sources of content properly referenced? 

A clear reference were expected.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ 
Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

Basically yes, overall the content was the strong positive out of the project, it was thorough and discussed everything that was required. The whole presentation has shown their understanding of project planning. However, the way the content was displayed and spoken about could of been improved. 

THE STILL IMAGES_ 
Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

Yes, images support he issues they were talking about.