Week7-Critical Reflection-Communication

GROUP: SHADE OF BLACK
GRADE: D


CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION _ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position? 


This team was well prepared with oral presentation. They all presented well however someone read on notes  a bit much. The information was clarified but some extent of information made me confused in the mix. 

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?


Yes; The context was really simple but ascensive. I personally liked their clear and simple  phrases and sentences to communicate with audience well. And the overall context was logic and reasonable.

DISTINCTIVEBNESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific? 


Related examples given and video of progress with all team members participated in. 

REFERENCING _ Are all sources of content properly referenced? 


No; I recommend to put all the resources in one single slide to make a reference list.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?


Good conceptual context; They did effectively communication between audience and themselves. Besides, their collaboration was good as a team.

THE STILL IMAGES_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

Images linked to each part of the presentation was very minimal. I was confused on how that reflected or helped at all with any part to the presentation. I would recommend images that are direct and clear with text in their representation, as what may seem clear for one person may not be the same for another.