Week8-Critical Reflection-Intellectual Property

GROUP:GEriAmbience
GRADE:C

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION _ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position? 

Generally they presented well and concise to the point. However, someone in the team obviously did not prepare that much but just read through the documents. And eye contact and body language help with emphasising key points and able to communicate with audience.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?


Writing was concise and clear, the keyword as outlining points is a good way to show the important issues in the reading.

DISTINCTIVEBNESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific? 


Provided good examples, most of it based on their project.

REFERENCING _ Are all sources of content properly referenced? 


Referencing of facts, elements and images are evident in the presentation.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?


Yes; They connect the issues to their own project, this creates a strong sense of understanding of IP. 

THE STILL IMAGES_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

No; Unfortunately, I could not even see one image so support their reading.